Forum

7 Simple Facts Abou...
 
7 Simple Facts About Election Audit Explained
7 Simple Facts About Election Audit Explained
Group: Registered
Joined: 2021-06-24
New Member

About Me

The statement of work also indicates that the contractor will "select a minimum of three precincts" in Maricopa County "with a high number of anomalies" in order "to conduct an audit of voting history" and that voters may be contacted through a "combination of phone calls and physical canvassing" to "collect information of whether the individual voted in the Election Audit" in November 2020. Statement of Work at ¶ 5.1. This description of the proposed work of the audit raises concerns regarding potential intimidation of voters. The Republican-controlled Senate is auditing the election results in Maricopa County, the largest county in the state and one won by Joe Biden, in spite of its long history of voting for Republican candidates. According to Just The News, because AccuVote machines are the only approved vote-counting machines in New Hampshire, if there is a technological issue with just one machine found, it could impact all of the state’s election results. In July 2019, Georgia purchased a $106 million election system from Dominion.  
The Arizona hand recount of 2.1 million Maricopa County ballots is on hold for the moment since the audit site had to be cleared this week for high school graduations. The Brennan Center for Justice think tank and two other groups asked the DOJ last week to send monitors to observe the audit, relaying concerns that auditors were violating federal law. The recount is taking far longer than expected, and counters had to vacate the facility for high school graduations last week. 43 on April 12, 2021. The bill authorized an audit of ballots and voting machines in Windham to determine why the reported results on Election Night and the results reported after the recount differed tremendously. Record all emergency paper ballots issued when using touch screen or direct- recording electronic voting systems and record the serial number of the machine. Arizona state Sen. Wendy Rogers, a Republican, issued on Twitter late on May 5 what appeared to be a warning in response to the DOJ letter. Fann is reportedly working on a response to the DOJ. "We would appreciate your response to the concerns described herein, including advising us of the steps that the Arizona Senate will take to ensure that violations of federal law do not occur," the letter threateningly added.  
Specifically, we believe that the senate and its agents, including Cyber Ninjas, are violating their duty under federal law to retain and Election Audit preserve ballots cast in a federal Election Audit, which are and have been in danger of being stolen, defaced, or irretrievably damaged. "The Department has reviewed available information, including news reports and complaints regarding the procedures being used for this audit," the letter continued. National File reports on how is the Maricopa County election audit being so corrupted. The exact details of the audit are still being determined, but Amero made clear the ballots will remain under the care of Fulton County election officials while the audit is conducted. "I write regarding issues arising under federal statutes enforced by the United States Department of Justice that are related to the audit required by the Arizona State Senate for the November 2020 federal general election in Maricopa County," the letter states.  
Within 15 days of each general or special election and within 7 days of every primary or village election. Arizona's November election is in the headlines again, after the Republican-led Senate there successfully used its subpoena power to obtain Maricopa County's 2.1 million general election ballots in order to audit the presidential and Senate races. Election workers rejected similar percentages of absentee ballots because of mismatched or missing signatures in the 2020 and 2018 general elections. A VoTeR Center report on Computer Assisted Post Election Audits explains that the semi-automated approach was developed because hand-counted audits are "expensive, time-consuming, labor-intensive and error-prone." According to the report, "It takes two auditors up to five hours to examine 1,000 ballots, while it was observed that hand counted audit returns routinely show up to 2 percent error." The report also notes that fully automated audits have associated risks and do not adequately provide confidence in election outcomes, so a combination of the two approaches was desirable. Todd Coconato Show Friday 6/4/2021 "Oh ye of little faith"… "The first issue relates to a number of reports suggesting that the ballots, elections systems, and election materials that are the subject of the Maricopa County audit are no longer under the ultimate control of state and local elections officials, are not being adequately safeguarded by contractors at an insecure facility, and are at risk of being lost, stolen, altered, compromised, or destroyed," Karlan wrote, citing a pair of news articles as the source for her assertions.

Occupation

Election Audit
Social Networks
Member Activity
0
Forum Posts
0
Topics
0
Questions
0
Answers
0
Question Comments
0
Liked
0
Received Likes
0/10
Rating
0
Blog Posts
0
Blog Comments
Share:

Please Login or Register